h4831sc for Dummies

This is certainly designed to be the "go to" powder-or darn near to it- for almost any bottle-necked cartridge one could handload. It truly is the muse for a lot of pet loads, still I have not been content with the outcomes.

They have got done identically for me. Like Absolutely everyone else I rushed to have the newer SC version but have now switched again. Ideally you would like about a hundred% loading density. When you have sufficient circumstance capability for the H4831(very long) you will be almost certainly much better off.

You are right They may be the same the SC is short Slice so it meters improved, I do not Assume you can find just typical 4831 any longer

Caution employing SC or SSC produced loads with extended Minimize, back again off and operate up. Use Secure loading strategies.

The only distinction as I realize it is that the SC was created to perform by powder actions greater (which it does). The more time grains tend not to feed nicely in the slightest degree in some actions. Thats my 02 :grin:

Considering the fact that there isn't going to seem like any "official" Load Data available for this Load, can a few of you provide a place to begin with this mix and matters to consider when working this Load up?

If there is not any load data it is actually for the reason that this powder isn't suited to this cartridge. Normally 1 will not find just one powder to fit all cartridges, and also the family of cartridges h4831 vs h4831sc with The actual powder (4831SC) that you'll be asking about doesn't do the job.

If you've some heavier .224" bullets, you would possibly find a load that works Alright With all the 4831. The bullets I attempted which were more than 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which experienced the standard 14" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the biggest bullet that could stabilize, but it surely did that beautifully. It's a funny-wanting bullet having a rounded nose profile, nonetheless it shoots terrific and kills effectively. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down straight away with rib-cage hits.

Any load data to h4831 vs h4831sc aid that? My very first assumed is it isn't gonna melt away every one of the way and velocities is going to be gradual and everywhere. Could possibly be a good fireworks display!

[electronic mail guarded] gn and one hundred fifteen CT's, I've killed much more Deer with h4831 vs h4831sc this particular combo than many of the rifles I very own blended, Work approximately this but the sweet spot might be all-around 54, I'm a Two Bit-06 nut and I have some things tat operates very well for me In the event your interested

As for that 4831 vs 4831SC, They can be the identical/identical powder cept for grain sizing. Load data is interchangeable.

It's been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Located a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 5 shot group currently. It really is a little bit slower than H1000, but shoots very good. Many thanks for the advice, It can be excellent to recognize that I've obtained choices when just one or the other powder is dried up.

Am i able to presume that H4831 is usually substituted for H4831sc ? I realize the Actual physical distinction but will it influence the burn or velocity? I believe not but I'm not one hundred% certain.

I discovered that my 7mag one hundred sixty partitions were sub MOA with 4831sc with low to min prices. I’m chatting 2700 (perhaps 2800) fps, it absolutely was a very low 60s grain cost inside a Norma circumstance. Not what I used to be searching for, but precise Nevertheless.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *